In 1996, the Labour Court recommended against a pay-parity claim for a worker at Adm Ringaskiddy who sought the shift superintendent's rate. The recommendation, dated 11 November 1996, said the Court found no grounds to concede the union's claim. The Technical, Engineering And Electrical Union said the worker had taken on plant-wide supervisory duties after a restructuring. Adm Ringaskiddy said the worker had accepted an agreement setting different pay terms and that matching the shift superintendent's rate would affect the company's agreed pay structure.
Labour Court recommends against pay parity claim at Adm Ringaskiddy
Historic decision · Decision date:
Place: no local area assigned from the source.