The Workplace Relations Commission found Mykhailo Synytsia’s written-terms complaint against Rasa Wellness Limited was not well founded. The decision was dated 1 April 2026. Synytsia said he was given a contract but declined to sign it because he disagreed with some terms, including the hours available. He also alleged that he did not receive a P45 or written confirmation when his employment ended, causing an underpayment. The WRC decision concerned only the written-terms complaint. The adjudicator found that Synytsia had received a written contract and that the employer met the statutory requirement to provide a written statement. The complaint was dismissed, and the decision recorded no compensation.
WRC dismisses Rasa Wellness employee’s written-terms complaint
Historic decision · Decision date:
Place: no local area assigned from the source.