Daniel Hughes’s appeal against the finding that his constructive unfair dismissal complaint against Action Alarm Control 24 Limited was not well founded has failed. Hughes said disciplinary flaws and a denied trial supervisory role left him no choice but to resign. The Court found shortcomings in the disciplinary process but ruled that Hughes had not exhausted the grievance procedure before resigning. It affirmed the original decision.
Labour Court rejects Daniel Hughes’s constructive dismissal appeal
Historic decision · Decision date:
Place: no local area assigned from the source.