The Workplace Relations Commission found that Masterlink Logistics Limited had not discriminated against Pawel Jarosz, whose complaint was not well founded. The decision was dated 31 January 2024. Jarosz alleged that his employer failed to provide reasonable accommodation when he returned to work after an injury. Masterlink said it was not his employer, and Jarosz accepted that the named entity was not the correct employer. He sought to amend the respondent’s title, while Masterlink opposed substituting what it said was a different legal entity. The adjudicator declined to amend the title, noting the subject matter would be considered in parallel proceedings. The complaint against Masterlink was not well founded because it was not Jarosz’s employer.
WRC rejects discrimination complaint against Masterlink Logistics
Historic decision · Decision date:
Place: no local area assigned from the source.