Judgment: 2014-12-18 · Court archive

High Court awards €75,000 for Garda’s knee injury after 1995 incident

The court found the officer’s right knee injury was probably caused by a workplace incident, but rejected a causal link between that incident and his later shoulder problems.

High Court · [2014] IEHC 645

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • The Minister for Finance (Respondent)
What

The court found the officer’s right knee injury was probably caused by a workplace incident, but rejected a causal link between that incident and his later shoulder problems.

Where

Places mentioned in the report

  • Ballyjamesduff
When

Judgment:

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The High Court awarded a retired Garda €75,000 in general damages for injuries it found attributable to an incident while he was on duty in Ballyjamesduff in November 1995. The court found that his right knee injury was causally related to the incident, but that he had not proved his later right shoulder problems were caused by it.

The High Court awarded a retired Garda €75,000 in general damages for injuries it found attributable to an incident while he was on duty in Ballyjamesduff in November 1995. The court found that his right knee injury was causally related to the incident, but that he had not proved his later right shoulder problems were caused by it.

The proceedings were brought under the Garda Siochana (Compensation) Acts 1941–1945. The applicant said he was restraining a man who was assaulting his partner when he was kicked and both men fell onto the road. He said his right shoulder struck a kerb and his right knee twisted in the fall.

The central dispute was causation. The Minister for Finance, the respondent, argued that the shoulder and knee conditions were not caused by the incident and disputed some claimed expenses. The applicant had also suffered a road traffic accident earlier in 1995, with neck, back and psychological symptoms. The court accepted medical evidence that the November incident aggravated pre-existing neck and back symptoms, which had settled, and contributed to psychological symptoms from which he had recovered by July 1996.

On the shoulder, the judge accepted the applicant’s evidence that he fell onto it, but found no convincing medical evidence linking the later localised shoulder symptoms to the incident. The symptoms were reported about two years later, and the court found the applicant had not established causation on the balance of probabilities.

The court reached a different conclusion on the knee. Although significant symptoms emerged later and the medical evidence differed, the judge accepted that the twisting movement during the fall could have caused a partial tear that progressed over time to a bucket-handle tear. The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the knee injury and the minor ongoing aches were attributable to the incident. It also accepted that degenerative changes and some continuing aches were compatible with the injury and surgery.

The court allowed special damages of €7,230.87, less any item referable to bursitis, which it found was not caused by the incident. It awarded €75,000 in general damages for all physical and psychological injuries attributable to the incident. The judgment does not state the final net special-damages amount.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review