The Labour Court did not recommend conceding the Services Industrial Professional Technical Union’s claim for a 20% differential for Leo Laboratories team leaders. The recommendation was dated 17 September 2003. The union said team leaders carried additional responsibilities and skills without extra pay. Leo Laboratories argued that a differential would disrupt its pay structure. The Court found the claim contrary to the 1993 agreement, which placed team leaders in Grade 2, and barred as cost-increasing under Sustaining Progress.
Labour Court rejects Leo Laboratories team leaders’ 20% pay claim
Historic decision · Decision date:
Place: no local area assigned from the source.