In 2003, the Labour Court said it could not determine from the information supplied whether workers had received Programme for Prosperity and Fairness increases due before the Employment Regulation Order. The recommendation was dated 29 July 2003. The dispute between Mid West Security and the Services Industrial Professional Technical Union also concerned a subsistence payment and average holiday pay. The Court accepted that the company was not expected to maintain payments that should have been taxed and said average holiday pay ended because of changes to the payment method following the Regulation.
Labour Court says it could not determine whether Mid West Security paid PPF increases
Historic decision · Decision date:
Place: no local area assigned from the source.