The Labour Court did not recommend a claim by the Services Industrial Professional Technical Union for an additional rate for workers operating a folding machine at Smurfit Web Press. The machine had been transferred from another company in the Smurfit group. The Court said the machine was neither new nor amended and that a similar machine already operated at a specific rate. It also noted that granting the claim would mean different rates for the same machinery within the company. The recommendation was signed on 20 March 2003.
Labour Court rejects union claim for extra folding-machine rate at Smurfit Web Press
Historic decision · Decision date:
Place: no local area assigned from the source.