The Workplace Relations Commission found that the Legal Services Regulatory Authority did not engage in prohibited conduct in Cathal Burke Austin’s Equal Status complaint. The decision was dated 26 August 2024, and no redress was awarded. Austin alleged that the authority discriminated against him by deeming seven complaints about legal practitioners inadmissible. The LSRA said it reviewed those complaints under its statutory process and denied discrimination. The adjudication officer found no discrimination, harassment, failure to provide reasonable accommodation or victimisation. The WRC did not rule on whether the LSRA’s inadmissibility decisions were valid or on the allegations against the legal practitioners. It decided only whether the LSRA engaged in prohibited conduct under the Equal Status Act.
WRC rejects Cathal Burke Austin’s Equal Status complaint against LSRA
Historic decision · Decision date:
Place: no local area assigned from the source.