Judgment: 2012-06-27 · Court archive

High Court awards €215,028 after Mountmellick crash injury claim

Liability was admitted, so the court assessed damages only. The judge accepted the plaintiff’s account of persistent back pain and awarded damages for injury and income loss.

High Court · [2012] IEHC 250

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Martin Laffan (Plaintiff)
  • Darren Quirke
  • Global Rail Services Limited (Defendant)
What

Liability was admitted, so the court assessed damages only. The judge accepted the plaintiff’s account of persistent back pain and awarded damages for injury and income loss.

Where

Places mentioned in the report

  • Connolly Street
  • Portlaoise General Hospital
  • Mountmellick
  • Portlaoise
When

Judgment:

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The court considered income loss difficult to quantify because business accounts for 2006 to 2011 had been reconstructed from limited records. The judge accepted a net after-tax estimate of €43,149 for 2009 to 2011, but applied a 20% discount for uncertainty, awarding €35,519 for past net income loss. For future losses, he used an estimated annual net loss of €12,000 and applied a further 20% deduction for contingencies, including an eventual economic recovery, resulting in €87,400 in gross future income losses.

The High Court awarded Martin Laffan €215,028 in damages after a 2009 road crash in Mountmellick, including €87,400 for future income loss. The defendants had conceded liability, leaving Mr Justice Hogan to assess damages only.

The accident happened on 12 June 2009 on Connolly Street, Mountmellick, when a van driven by Darren Quirke and operated by Global Rail Services Limited crossed into the path of Mr Laffan’s car. His young son was in the back seat. The collision deployed the car’s airbags and caused injuries including bruising, a bitten tongue, and injuries to his neck, back, shoulder, sternum and ankle. He was taken to Portlaoise General Hospital.

The judge said most of the soft tissue injuries had largely healed, but Mr Laffan continued to suffer back pain that worsened during the day and disrupted his sleep. Medical evidence differed on the outlook. His consultant considered the pain consistent with soft tissue injury and lumbar degeneration, and said he would not return to heavy lifting. The defendants’ consultant attributed his poor progress largely to psychological factors and expected no long-term physical complications.

After hearing the evidence, the judge accepted Mr Laffan’s account as convincing and awarded €60,000 for past pain and suffering and €30,000 for future pain and suffering. The judgment also recorded mild to moderate adjustment disorder after the crash; the psychiatrist’s evidence was that therapy should resolve those psychological symptoms.

The court considered income loss difficult to quantify because business accounts for 2006 to 2011 had been reconstructed from limited records. The judge accepted a net after-tax estimate of €43,149 for 2009 to 2011, but applied a 20% discount for uncertainty, awarding €35,519 for past net income loss. For future losses, he used an estimated annual net loss of €12,000 and applied a further 20% deduction for contingencies, including an eventual economic recovery, resulting in €87,400 in gross future income losses.

The total award also included €2,109 in agreed special damages, including vehicle damage. The judgment states the final sum as €215,028.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review