Judgment: 2014-11-10 · Court archive

Court of Appeal upholds nine-year sentence for Cappawhite sword attack

Court of Appeal ·

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Liam McCarthy (Appellant)
  • Martin Butler
What

Court of Appeal upholds nine-year sentence for Cappawhite sword attack

Where

Places mentioned in the report

  • Cappawhite
  • Clonmel Circuit Criminal Court
  • Cork University Hospital
  • Court of Appeal
When

Judgment:

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The Court of Appeal rejected that argument. It said that leaving the scene, obtaining a lethal weapon and returning to attack an unsuspecting victim involved a clear period for cooling off. Any provocation was therefore of little significance, while the response was wholly disproportionate.

The Court of Appeal has upheld a nine-year prison sentence imposed on Liam McCarthy for a sword attack in Cappawhite, County Tipperary, which left Martin Butler with permanent disabilities.

McCarthy had pleaded guilty at Clonmel Circuit Criminal Court to assault causing serious harm under section 4 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997.

The offence occurred on the night of March 29, 2013. What began as a relatively minor disagreement developed into an alcohol-fuelled street fight involving several men. McCarthy was himself injured during the altercation.

However, he then left the group, went to a nearby house and armed himself with a sword. He returned and struck Butler from behind on the left side of the head, causing a penetrating skull injury.

Butler required surgery at Cork University Hospital and, according to the judgment, was fortunate to survive. He was left with significant permanent disabilities, including communication and speech difficulties, weakness on his right side, a paralysed right arm and the need for a walking aid.

On appeal, McCarthy argued in part that the sentencing judge had not given sufficient weight to provocation arising from the earlier fight.

The Court of Appeal rejected that argument. It said that leaving the scene, obtaining a lethal weapon and returning to attack an unsuspecting victim involved a clear period for cooling off. Any provocation was therefore of little significance, while the response was wholly disproportionate.

The court accepted substantial mitigation. McCarthy admitted his involvement quickly, pleaded guilty early, cooperated with Gardaí and expressed genuine remorse. His difficult background, previous misuse of intoxicants, subsequent sobriety and anxiety were also taken into account.

Against that were the premeditated nature of the attack, use of a lethal weapon, catastrophic injuries and the fact that McCarthy was already serving a six-month suspended sentence for another assault committed four months earlier.

The Court of Appeal held that the nine-year term adequately reflected those competing factors and dismissed the appeal.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review