Judgment: 2018-03-23 · Court archive

High Court refuses challenge to naturalisation denial after uninsured driving

The court rejected Sulaimon Kareem’s judicial review of the Minister’s refusal, finding the decision to be based on his admitted conduct and recent offence. It directed the parties to address whether a wasted costs order should be considered.

High Court · [2018] IEHC 200

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Sulaimon Kareem (Applicant)
  • The Minister for Justice and Equality (Respondent)
What

The court rejected Sulaimon Kareem’s judicial review of the Minister’s refusal, finding the decision to be based on his admitted conduct and recent offence. It directed the parties to address whether a wasted costs order should be considered.

Where

No place detail is included in this summary.

When

Judgment:

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The High Court has refused Sulaimon Kareem’s application to quash the Minister for Justice and Equality’s decision not to grant him a certificate of naturalisation, finding no legal basis to overturn the decision. The court also directed the parties, particularly Mr Kareem’s legal representatives, to address whether the proceedings could warrant a wasted costs order. It did not make such an order in this judgment.

The High Court has refused Sulaimon Kareem’s application to quash the Minister for Justice and Equality’s decision not to grant him a certificate of naturalisation, finding no legal basis to overturn the decision. The court also directed the parties, particularly Mr Kareem’s legal representatives, to address whether the proceedings could warrant a wasted costs order. It did not make such an order in this judgment.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review