Judgment: 2008-10-31 · Court archive

High Court widens discovery order in accountants’ dispute

The court allowed the client company’s appeal against a narrower discovery order, but replaced its nine proposed categories with two defined groups of records.

High Court · [2008] IEHC 340

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Oppermann Associates Limited (Plaintiff)
What

The court allowed the client company’s appeal against a narrower discovery order, but replaced its nine proposed categories with two defined groups of records.

Where

No place detail is included in this summary.

When

Judgment:

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The High Court has ordered broader document discovery in a dispute between Oppermann Associates Limited and its former accountants, after finding that an earlier order was too restrictive. The ruling concerns what records must be disclosed before trial; it does not decide the underlying claim.

The High Court has ordered broader document discovery in a dispute between Oppermann Associates Limited and its former accountants, after finding that an earlier order was too restrictive. The ruling concerns what records must be disclosed before trial; it does not decide the underlying claim.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review