Judgment: 2018-02-23 · Court archive

High Court awards €94,757.72 after finding crash worsened woman’s spinal pain

Liability was not disputed in the 2014 M50 collision. The court awarded €55,000 for past pain and suffering, €20,000 for future pain and suffering, and an agreed sum for special damages.

High Court · [2018] IEHC 102

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Barbara Seligman (Plaintiff)
What

Liability was not disputed in the 2014 M50 collision. The court awarded €55,000 for past pain and suffering, €20,000 for future pain and suffering, and an agreed sum for special damages.

Where

No place detail is included in this summary.

When

Judgment:

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The High Court awarded Barbara Seligman €94,757.72 in damages after finding that a December 2014 road traffic accident exacerbated degenerative changes in her spine that had been symptom-free for years.

The High Court awarded Barbara Seligman €94,757.72 in damages after finding that a December 2014 road traffic accident exacerbated degenerative changes in her spine that had been symptom-free for years.

Liability was not in issue. The court heard that Seligman’s stationary car was struck from behind while she was in traffic on the M50. The impact pushed her car into the vehicle ahead, which in turn struck another car. There was no claim of contributory negligence.

Mr Justice Barr, delivering judgment on 23 February 2018, accepted Seligman’s account of continuing neck and back pain and the restrictions it caused. He found that she had not exaggerated her symptoms. Before the collision, she had a history of back pain and spinal degeneration, but said she had been pain-free and fully mobile for years.

Medical reports described persistent pain, difficulty with stairs and long drives, and treatment with rhizotomy procedures. The court preferred the opinion of her treating pain specialist, Dr Paul Murphy, that her pain was facet-joint mediated and related to the accident. The judge also accepted that the collision had aggravated underlying degeneration that had been asymptomatic for many years.

The evidence included differing views on prognosis. Dr Murphy considered that pain and disability were likely to continue, while a pain specialist retained by the defendants expected gradual improvement, though not necessarily a complete resolution. The judge noted that the specialists agreed further rhizotomy treatment would be needed. He found that Seligman remained significantly disabled in ordinary activities, particularly climbing stairs and driving long distances.

The court awarded €55,000 for pain and suffering to the date of judgment and €20,000 for future pain and suffering. It added an agreed special-damages sum. The judgment gives that sum as €19,757.72 in its introduction, but as €19,757.20 in the paragraph calculating the total. The overall award stated by the court was €94,757.72.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review