Judgment: 2021-09-23 · Court archive

High Court refuses to surrender Limerick truck driver to Poland after 11-year delay

High Court · [2021] IEHC 632

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Robert Adam Lach (Respondent)
What

High Court refuses to surrender Limerick truck driver to Poland after 11-year delay

Where

Places mentioned in the report

  • Limerick
  • Poland
  • Ireland
When

Judgment:

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The High Court has refused to surrender Limerick-based truck driver Robert Adam Lach to Poland after finding that an approximately 11-year delay following an earlier failed surrender process amounted to an abuse of the court's process.

The High Court has refused to surrender Limerick-based truck driver Robert Adam Lach to Poland after finding that an approximately 11-year delay following an earlier failed surrender process amounted to an abuse of the court's process.

Poland sought Lach's return to serve a sentence of one year and three months for an attempted theft from a motor vehicle committed in December 1997. The sentence had originally been suspended but was activated after he failed to report to prison.

This was not Poland's first attempt to secure his return. The High Court ordered Lach's surrender in December 2008 and that order was upheld on appeal in January 2009. He spent about six months in custody in Ireland. However, the surrender was never carried out, and an application to extend the time available to complete it was refused in February 2009.

Lach was released and continued living in Ireland. He later married, had a son and worked as a truck driver in Limerick.

A fresh European arrest warrant was issued in May 2016, but it was not transmitted to Ireland for execution. Lach was eventually arrested on a Schengen alert and brought before the High Court in May 2021.

Mr Justice Paul Burns accepted that delay alone will not normally defeat a valid European arrest warrant. He also found that Lach's family circumstances, taken alone, would not justify refusing surrender.

The decisive issue was the cumulative history. The court identified the earlier six months in custody, the failure to implement the first surrender order, the unexplained years of inaction, Poland's knowledge that Lach had been living in Ireland and the comparatively modest seriousness of the underlying offending.

The judge found no adequate justification for allowing the surrender process to remain effectively dormant for so long. He ruled that a fresh order after such prolonged inaction would amount to an abuse of process and refused surrender.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review