Judgment: 2021-05-19 · Court archive

High Court dismisses Ulster Bank’s bid to have claims struck out

The court ordered Ulster Bank to pay Eoin Fannon’s reasonable costs of the application, subject to adjudication if the parties cannot agree and a limited stay if there is an appeal.

The High Court, Chancery · [2021] IEHC 351

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Eoin Fannon (Plaintiff)
  • Ulster Bank Ireland DAC (Defendant)
What

The court ordered Ulster Bank to pay Eoin Fannon’s reasonable costs of the application, subject to adjudication if the parties cannot agree and a limited stay if there is an appeal.

Where

No place detail is included in this summary.

When

Judgment:

Other dates in the report
  • 28 April 2021

    The ruling, delivered by Mr Justice Keane on 19 May 2021, deals with the final orders and costs following the court’s 28 April 2021 judgment refusing the bank’s application. It says the earlier judgment should be read alongside the ruling and identifies it as [2021] IEHC 301.

Why

Read the report below for the decision and any reasons given.

The High Court has dismissed Ulster Bank Ireland DAC’s application to have Eoin Fannon’s claims against it dismissed as bound to fail and ordered the bank to pay his reasonable costs of the application.

The ruling, delivered by Mr Justice Keane on 19 May 2021, deals with the final orders and costs following the court’s 28 April 2021 judgment refusing the bank’s application. It says the earlier judgment should be read alongside the ruling and identifies it as [2021] IEHC 301.

Ulster Bank’s solicitors wrote to the court on 12 May, saying the bank did not oppose an order for Mr Fannon’s reasonable costs. The bank proposed that those costs be adjudicated if the parties could not agree, with execution of the costs order stayed in the event of an appeal until the Court of Appeal’s first directions hearing. The judge said no countervailing submission had been received and that the proposed order met the justice of the situation.

The final orders dismiss the application and direct Ulster Bank to pay Mr Fannon’s reasonable costs, including reserved costs and the costs of submissions. If the parties do not agree the amount, it is to be adjudicated. If there is an appeal, execution of the costs order is stayed up to the date of the first directions hearing in the Court of Appeal.

The ruling concerns the application against Ulster Bank. It does not set out the merits or final outcome of Mr Fannon’s underlying claims.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review