Judgment: 2018-10-19 · Court archive

Court of Appeal suspends final year of sentence for man who placed pipe bomb at Dublin home

The court substituted a five-year sentence with the final 12 months suspended for two years after finding insufficient weight had been given to the cumulative mitigating factors.

Court of Appeal ·

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Mark O’Shea (Appellant)
  • Máire Whelan (Judge)
What

The court substituted a five-year sentence with the final 12 months suspended for two years after finding insufficient weight had been given to the cumulative mitigating factors.

Where

Places mentioned in the report

  • Dublin 3
  • Dublin
When

Judgment:

Other dates in the report
  • 11 June 2017

    The Court of Appeal judgment, delivered by Ms Justice Máire Whelan on 19 October 2018, said a pipe bomb was found in the driveway of a prison officer’s home in Dublin 3 on 11 June 2017. The officer’s young son found it while playing outside and brought it into the house. Family members handled it before the officer realised it was a bomb. The family left the house and a bomb-disposal team attended.

  • 14 June 2017; 23 November 2017

    O’Shea had pleaded guilty to possessing an explosive in suspicious circumstances, contrary to section 4 of the Explosive Substances Act 1883, as amended. Dublin Circuit Criminal Court imposed the five-year sentence on 23 November 2017, backdated to 14 June 2017, when he first went into custody. He appealed on grounds of severity.

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The Court of Appeal substituted a five-year prison sentence for Mark O’Shea with a five-year sentence whose final 12 months were suspended for two years after his release. It found that the sentencing judge had given insufficient weight to the cumulative effect of mitigating factors, including that the device was not viable and O’Shea did not know the home belonged to a prison officer.

The Court of Appeal substituted a five-year prison sentence for Mark O’Shea with a five-year sentence whose final 12 months were suspended for two years after his release. It found that the sentencing judge had given insufficient weight to the cumulative effect of mitigating factors, including that the device was not viable and O’Shea did not know the home belonged to a prison officer.

O’Shea had pleaded guilty to possessing an explosive in suspicious circumstances, contrary to section 4 of the Explosive Substances Act 1883, as amended. Dublin Circuit Criminal Court imposed the five-year sentence on 23 November 2017, backdated to 14 June 2017, when he first went into custody. He appealed on grounds of severity.

The Court of Appeal judgment, delivered by Ms Justice Máire Whelan on 19 October 2018, said a pipe bomb was found in the driveway of a prison officer’s home in Dublin 3 on 11 June 2017. The officer’s young son found it while playing outside and brought it into the house. Family members handled it before the officer realised it was a bomb. The family left the house and a bomb-disposal team attended.

CCTV showed O’Shea placing the device under a car. During a garda interview, he said two people had asked him to put an item under a car for money, and he knew it was a pipe bomb. The court said he did not know the residents included a prison officer. The judgment recorded that his reward was €20 or two trays of tablets.

A ballistics examination found the device contained shotgun cartridge pellets and propellant. The fuse was missing and was never recovered. Evidence at sentencing was that the bomb could not have exploded without a fuse. The Court of Appeal described the device as not viable, while also stressing that O’Shea knew he was placing a pipe bomb at a private home and acted with indifference to the risk of harm.

The court noted his early guilty plea, cooperation with gardaí, remorse, efforts at rehabilitation in custody and drug-free status at sentencing. It also recorded his cross-addiction to heroin, diamorphine pills and alcohol, and that he had been exploited by others. The court held that the sentencing judge had taken account of these matters but had not given enough weight to their combined effect.

The substituted sentence suspended the final 12 months for two years after O’Shea’s release. The suspension was conditional on his entering a bond to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for 24 months from his release.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review