Judgment: 2015-10-22 · Court archive

High Court raises compensation award to €250,000 for woman with permanent brain injury

The court allowed A.M.’s appeal over general damages arising from decompensated cirrhosis and encephalopathy, and said it would discuss the final form of the order with counsel.

High Court · [2015] IEHC 660

Who, what, where, when and why

Who

See the report below for the parties involved.

What

The court allowed A.M.’s appeal over general damages arising from decompensated cirrhosis and encephalopathy, and said it would discuss the final form of the order with counsel.

Where

No place detail is included in this summary.

When

Judgment:

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

A.M. appealed a Hepatitis C Compensation Tribunal award made on 13 April 2015. The tribunal had awarded €180,000 in total, including €150,000 for general damages. Her appeal was limited to the general damages award; she was satisfied with the grounds allowing her to return to the tribunal later if required.

The High Court has allowed A.M.’s appeal against the general damages awarded for decompensated cirrhosis and its consequences, setting that compensation at €250,000. The court said it would discuss the final form of the order with counsel.

A.M. appealed a Hepatitis C Compensation Tribunal award made on 13 April 2015. The tribunal had awarded €180,000 in total, including €150,000 for general damages. Her appeal was limited to the general damages award; she was satisfied with the grounds allowing her to return to the tribunal later if required.

A.M. contracted hepatitis C after receiving an anti-D injection from an infected batch in 1977. In 1998, the tribunal made a provisional award that allowed her to return if her condition deteriorated to decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. The High Court said that award had not compensated her for the occurrence or consequences of decompensated cirrhosis.

On medical advice, A.M. began antiviral treatment in September 2013 as her liver disease progressed. The treatment cleared the virus, but the judgment said it triggered decompensation. A scan confirmed ascites, and her condition progressed to hepatic encephalopathy. The court accepted medical evidence that the encephalopathy had caused, and was likely permanently to cause, psychological and functional impairment. A.M. described losing independence, becoming forgetful and fatigued, and relying more on her husband. Her doctors hoped treatment would prevent further progression, but the condition was considered irreversible.

The Minister’s counsel argued that the antiviral treatment fell outside the conditions of the provisional award and was not compensatable. The High Court rejected that argument, finding the treatment medically necessary and inextricably bound up with the decompensated cirrhosis that entitled A.M. to return to the tribunal. It also accepted that the tribunal had been entitled to take the treatment’s consequences into account, while concluding that its general damages assessment was inadequate.

The court set €250,000 as fair and reasonable general damages for the decompensated cirrhosis and its consequences, and allowed the appeal. The judgment does not state the final total compensation figure; it records that the court would discuss the final form of the order with counsel.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review