Judgment: 2025-06-04 · Court archive

High Court refuses to strike out nursing home death claim over uncle's collapse after lung surgery

High Court · [2025] IEHC 327

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Finbarr Tolan (Plaintiff)
  • Patrick Concannon
  • Mr Justice Barr
What

High Court refuses to strike out nursing home death claim over uncle's collapse after lung surgery

Where

Places mentioned in the report

  • Brookvale Manor Nursing Home
When

Judgment:

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

Mr Justice Barr held that the action brought by Concannon's nephew and named executor, Finbarr Tolan, was not bound to fail and should not be dismissed at this preliminary stage.

The High Court has refused to strike out a negligence claim against Brookvale Manor Nursing Home arising from the death of 76-year-old Patrick Concannon shortly after he entered its care following lung cancer surgery.

Mr Justice Barr held that the action brought by Concannon's nephew and named executor, Finbarr Tolan, was not bound to fail and should not be dismissed at this preliminary stage.

Tolan alleges that his uncle's condition deteriorated sharply after admission to the nursing home in July 2021. He said Concannon appeared seriously unwell, complained of chest and stomach pain and shortness of breath, and was breathing heavily. Tolan said he raised those concerns with a nurse and separately contacted his uncle's GP practice seeking an examination.

Concannon later collapsed and died at 7.10pm. A post-mortem recorded pulmonary thromboembolism and ischaemic heart disease as the cause of death.

The nursing home sought to have the proceedings struck out on three grounds. It argued that Tolan lacked standing because he had not extracted a grant of probate, that his medical evidence could not establish that any alleged negligence caused the death, and that he had wrongly begun the case by plenary summons rather than personal injury summons.

The court rejected dismissal on all three grounds. On standing, it held that because Tolan was named as sole executor, the proper course was to stay the case until he obtained probate.

On causation, the judge accepted that Tolan's existing medical report may not satisfy the conventional 'but for' test if applied strictly. However, he found that causation in these circumstances was legally nuanced and could not fairly be resolved on a strike-out application without evidence and argument.

The procedural defect was also curable. The existing pleadings will be treated as standing in place of a personal injury summons, subject to Tolan filing an affidavit of verification.

The claim therefore remains alive, but proceedings are stayed until both probate and the verification affidavit are filed.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review