Judgment: 2016-07-25 · Court archive

Court cuts Cork drug sentence from seven years to four, reducing total term to 14 years

The Court of Appeal left the 10-year Wexford sentence and its consecutive structure in place, but reduced the earlier sentence after finding the combined 17-year term unduly harsh.

The Court of Appeal ·

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Martin McBride (Appellant)
What

The Court of Appeal left the 10-year Wexford sentence and its consecutive structure in place, but reduced the earlier sentence after finding the combined 17-year term unduly harsh.

Where

Places mentioned in the report

  • Cork
  • Enniscorthy
When

Judgment:

Other dates in the report
  • 12 May 2011; 29 November 2011

    The Cork offence arose after gardaí searched McBride’s car on 12 May 2011 and found cannabis herb and resin with a stated street value of €97,680. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment on 29 November 2011. The sentencing judge cited his guilty plea, cooperation, lack of previous convictions and standing in the community as mitigating factors, and imposed less than the 10-year minimum applicable to a first offence because of exceptional circumstances.

  • 16 November 2011; 24 October 2013

    On 16 November 2011, while on bail in the Cork case and after pleading guilty there but before being sentenced, McBride’s home in Enniscorthy, Co Wexford, was searched under warrant. Drugs, mostly cannabis herb and resin, with a stated street value of €44,052 were found. He later pleaded guilty to a second offence under section 15A of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977 and received 10 years in prison on 24 October 2013.

  • 24 October 2014

    The court cited McBride’s guilty pleas and remorse, testimonials, prison education and course reports, and steps to address his drug addiction when assessing the overall term. It quashed the seven-year Cork sentence and substituted four years. The judgment says the Wexford sentences and their structure remained unaltered; its final paragraph gives the Wexford sentencing date as 24 October 2014, although earlier passages state 24 October 2013.

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The court said the combined term was unduly harsh when assessed as a whole. It held that it could reduce the Cork sentence in the interests of totality and proportionality, even though no error of principle had been identified in that sentence.

The Court of Appeal reduced Martin McBride’s sentence for a Cork drug offence from seven years to four, bringing his total effective prison term from 17 years to 14. It left unchanged the 10-year sentence for a later Wexford offence and the order that it be served consecutively.

The court said the combined term was unduly harsh when assessed as a whole. It held that it could reduce the Cork sentence in the interests of totality and proportionality, even though no error of principle had been identified in that sentence.

The Cork offence arose after gardaí searched McBride’s car on 12 May 2011 and found cannabis herb and resin with a stated street value of €97,680. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment on 29 November 2011. The sentencing judge cited his guilty plea, cooperation, lack of previous convictions and standing in the community as mitigating factors, and imposed less than the 10-year minimum applicable to a first offence because of exceptional circumstances.

On 16 November 2011, while on bail in the Cork case and after pleading guilty there but before being sentenced, McBride’s home in Enniscorthy, Co Wexford, was searched under warrant. Drugs, mostly cannabis herb and resin, with a stated street value of €44,052 were found. He later pleaded guilty to a second offence under section 15A of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977 and received 10 years in prison on 24 October 2013.

The appeal challenged whether the second offence attracted the mandatory 10-year term when it occurred before the Cork sentence was imposed, whether that term had to run consecutively under the rules for offences committed on bail, and whether part of it could be suspended. The Court of Appeal held that a guilty plea or finding of guilt can amount to a conviction for the repeat-offence provisions before sentence is imposed. It also said the consecutive-sentence requirement left no discretion in this case. The 10-year minimum and consecutive direction therefore remained in force.

The court cited McBride’s guilty pleas and remorse, testimonials, prison education and course reports, and steps to address his drug addiction when assessing the overall term. It quashed the seven-year Cork sentence and substituted four years. The judgment says the Wexford sentences and their structure remained unaltered; its final paragraph gives the Wexford sentencing date as 24 October 2014, although earlier passages state 24 October 2013.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review