Judgment: 2015-03-20 · Court archive

High Court rules hip implant claim against manufacturer required PIAB authorisation

The court held that the claim arose from the alleged manufacture and supply of a defective implant, outside the medical-care exclusions in the PIAB Act.

The High Court · [2015] IEHC 153

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Randa Murphy (Plaintiff)
  • DePuy International Limited (Defendant)
What

The court held that the claim arose from the alleged manufacture and supply of a defective implant, outside the medical-care exclusions in the PIAB Act.

Where

No place detail is included in this summary.

When

Judgment:

Why

Read the report below for the decision and any reasons given.

The High Court ruled that Randa Murphy’s personal injury claim against DePuy International Limited required authorisation from the Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) before court proceedings could be brought. The ruling addressed that preliminary procedural issue; it did not determine the merits of her injury allegations.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review