Judgment: 2016-05-05 · Court archive

High Court awards €400,000 for Garda officer’s injuries, leaves earnings calculation open

The court also allowed €45,000 for lost future employment opportunity and set the method for calculating future earnings to age 60. The final form of the orders remained to be settled.

The High Court · [2016] IEHC 295

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • The Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform (Respondent)
  • Bernard J. Barton (Judge)
  • Patrick Devitt
What

The court also allowed €45,000 for lost future employment opportunity and set the method for calculating future earnings to age 60. The final form of the orders remained to be settled.

Where

Places mentioned in the report

  • Westport
When

Judgment:

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The court found the officer would probably have reached the rank of Sergeant, but said promotion to Inspector was too speculative. It concluded that he was unlikely to secure and retain even basic, stress-free employment that would provide a meaningful income. The judge preferred the evidence of psychiatrist Dr Patrick Devitt that the end of the litigation and the officer’s separation from the force might help his psychological recovery, while accepting that any improvement would not make meaningful employment likely.

The High Court assessed €400,000 in compensation for a Garda officer who suffered severe, lasting injuries in a knife assault while on duty in Westport. It also awarded €45,000 for the loss of an opportunity to work after retirement, but left the calculation of future earnings and other benefits to age 60 for further discussion with counsel.

The judgment, delivered by Mr Justice Bernard J. Barton on 5 May 2016, arose under the Garda Síochána (Compensation) Acts. The Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform had authorised the proceedings. The court said the malicious infliction of the injuries and loss was not in question.

The officer was on plain-clothes drugs squad duty during a street festival on 9 August 2009 when, after identifying himself to a group of men, he pursued one who appeared to be carrying a suspicious implement. The assailant stabbed him repeatedly in the abdomen. The injuries required emergency surgery, including removal of his spleen, and further procedures and treatment for infection. The officer later experienced continuing pain and muscle spasms, as well as psychological effects. The judgment said his injuries were permanent and he would need ongoing treatment and medication.

The court assessed pain and suffering at €250,000 to the date of judgment and €150,000 for the future. It also recorded €100,000 in agreed past pecuniary losses and €200,000 in agreed future medical, medication and travel expenses, together totalling €300,000 in agreed special losses.

The court found the officer would probably have reached the rank of Sergeant, but said promotion to Inspector was too speculative. It concluded that he was unlikely to secure and retain even basic, stress-free employment that would provide a meaningful income. The judge preferred the evidence of psychiatrist Dr Patrick Devitt that the end of the litigation and the officer’s separation from the force might help his psychological recovery, while accepting that any improvement would not make meaningful employment likely.

For earnings and benefits up to age 60, the court set a real rate of return of 1.5% and applied a 20% deduction for contingencies. The resulting sum remained to be calculated. For the period from age 60 to 68, the court awarded €45,000 for loss of opportunity rather than assessing a specific earnings figure, citing uncertainty about the work and terms the officer might have obtained.

The judgment said the €45,000 would be added to the €400,000 general compensation and €300,000 agreed special losses, along with the future earnings and benefits sum once calculated. The judge said he would discuss the final form of the orders with counsel.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review