Judgment: 2011-11-25 · Court archive

High Court refuses leave to challenge possession order over delay and lack of arguable grounds

The applicant received one final stay until 10 January 2012; after that, Ulster Bank could enforce the existing possession order.

The High Court · [2011] IEHC 438

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Ulster Bank
  • Mr Justice Michael Peart
What

The applicant received one final stay until 10 January 2012; after that, Ulster Bank could enforce the existing possession order.

Where

No place detail is included in this summary.

When

Judgment:

Other dates in the report
  • 10 January 2012

    The High Court refused an applicant leave to seek judicial review of an order for possession of a jointly owned home, finding that his application was out of time and disclosed no arguable ground. Mr Justice Michael Peart granted a final stay until 10 January 2012, after which Ulster Bank could enforce the possession order and recover the property.

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The High Court refused an applicant leave to seek judicial review of an order for possession of a jointly owned home, finding that his application was out of time and disclosed no arguable ground. Mr Justice Michael Peart granted a final stay until 10 January 2012, after which Ulster Bank could enforce the possession order and recover the property.

The High Court refused an applicant leave to seek judicial review of an order for possession of a jointly owned home, finding that his application was out of time and disclosed no arguable ground. Mr Justice Michael Peart granted a final stay until 10 January 2012, after which Ulster Bank could enforce the possession order and recover the property.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review