Judgment: 2019-12-09 · Court archive

High Court grants Start Mortgages leave to execute 2011 possession order

The court allowed the lender to issue execution after finding its delay was explained by enforcement difficulties and efforts to reach an agreement with the borrowers. It did not make a new possession order.

High Court · [2019] IEHC 830

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Start Mortgages
  • Peter Gawley
  • Garrett Simons (Judge)
What

The court allowed the lender to issue execution after finding its delay was explained by enforcement difficulties and efforts to reach an agreement with the borrowers. It did not make a new possession order.

Where

No place detail is included in this summary.

When

Judgment:

Other dates in the report
  • 11 November 2019

    The application was heard on 11 November 2019. The court granted Start Mortgages DAC leave to issue execution on foot of the 7 March 2011 possession order.

  • 7 March 2011

    Mr Justice Garrett Simons made the order on 9 December 2019 under Order 42, rule 24 of the Rules of the Superior Courts. The application concerned an existing possession order made on 7 March 2011. The court’s decision grants permission to execute on that order; it does not make a new possession order.

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The High Court has granted Start Mortgages DAC leave to issue execution on a 2011 order for possession, after finding a reasonable explanation for the delay and no countervailing prejudice to the defendants.

The High Court has granted Start Mortgages DAC leave to issue execution on a 2011 order for possession, after finding a reasonable explanation for the delay and no countervailing prejudice to the defendants.

Mr Justice Garrett Simons made the order on 9 December 2019 under Order 42, rule 24 of the Rules of the Superior Courts. The application concerned an existing possession order made on 7 March 2011. The court’s decision grants permission to execute on that order; it does not make a new possession order.

Start Mortgages said earlier enforcement attempts were postponed after details of the sheriff’s planned attendance at the property appeared on anti-eviction websites and social media. Its affidavit also described efforts to engage with the defendants, including offers of voluntary surrender or an assisted sale. The court considered those efforts a reasonable explanation for the delay.

Peter Gawley opposed the application, arguing that Start Mortgages was not entitled to own the mortgage charge. The court held that the issue had already been addressed in earlier High Court orders substituting Start Mortgages as plaintiff, and could not be raised again in this application. It also held that the challenge to the Register of Title was inadmissible in possession proceedings.

The judge noted that Gawley had not identified prejudice caused by the lapse of time. He appeared to have remained in residence at the mortgaged property, and no mortgage payments had been made since June 2014, the judgment said.

The application was heard on 11 November 2019. The court granted Start Mortgages DAC leave to issue execution on foot of the 7 March 2011 possession order.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review