Judgment: 2016-03-02 · Court archive

Court of Appeal allows builders’ appeal over limitation ruling

The court held that the negligence claim accrued when damage appeared in December 2005, not when defective foundations were installed. It sent the case back to the High Court without deciding whether damages should be assessed there.

Court of Appeal ·

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Liam Brandley
  • WJB Developments Limited (Plaintiff)
  • Hubert Deane
  • John Lohan
What

The court held that the negligence claim accrued when damage appeared in December 2005, not when defective foundations were installed. It sent the case back to the High Court without deciding whether damages should be assessed there.

Where

Places mentioned in the report

  • Williamstown, County Galway
  • Williamstown
  • County Galway
When

Judgment:

Other dates in the report
  • 30 November 2010; 16 April 2015

    The plaintiffs issued proceedings on 30 November 2010. Both defendants pleaded the Statute of Limitations. After an earlier application by Deane was refused because factual disputes could not be resolved on affidavit, both defendants applied to have the claim dismissed. The High Court granted their applications following a hearing with oral evidence on 16 April 2015, finding the claim out of time.

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The plaintiffs issued proceedings on 30 November 2010. Both defendants pleaded the Statute of Limitations. After an earlier application by Deane was refused because factual disputes could not be resolved on affidavit, both defendants applied to have the claim dismissed. The High Court granted their applications following a hearing with oral evidence on 16 April 2015, finding the claim out of time.

The Court of Appeal has allowed an appeal by Liam Brandley and WJB Developments Limited against a High Court decision dismissing their claim as statute-barred, and remitted the case to the High Court.

The dispute concerns two houses at Williamstown, County Galway. Brandley, described in the judgment as the developer acting through his company, sued consulting engineer Hubert Deane and ground works contractor John Lohan over the houses’ foundations and construction. The claim alleged breach of contract and negligence.

The foundations were completed in March 2004. Deane certified compliance with planning permission and building regulations on 4 September that year. The houses were completed in January or February 2005, and Brandley observed cracks in each in December 2005.

The plaintiffs issued proceedings on 30 November 2010. Both defendants pleaded the Statute of Limitations. After an earlier application by Deane was refused because factual disputes could not be resolved on affidavit, both defendants applied to have the claim dismissed. The High Court granted their applications following a hearing with oral evidence on 16 April 2015, finding the claim out of time.

On appeal, the defendants argued that the limitation period began when the defective foundations were installed in March 2004. The plaintiffs accepted that the test was not when damage was discovered, but argued that a negligence claim requires actual loss or damage, which they said arose when the cracks appeared.

The Court of Appeal held that installing defective foundations did not, by itself, establish actionable damage in negligence. It found that the evidence was that damage occurred in December 2005, rather than that earlier damage was merely discovered then. As a result, the defendants had placed the start of the limitation period too early.

The court allowed the appeal and returned the matter to the High Court. It noted that the defendants had expressly admitted negligence and said the case appeared likely to proceed as an assessment of damages. However, that issue was not before the Court of Appeal, which left it for the High Court to decide if it arose. The appeal judgment did not itself award damages or determine their amount.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review