Judgment: 2015-12-02 · Court archive

ESB liable for fire damage, but Nolan couple’s award cut by half

The High Court found ageing electrical wiring was the more likely cause of a 2013 house fire, while the plaintiffs’ failure to consult the ESB and work that increased the risk of serious consequences amounted to contributory negligence.

The High Court · [2015] IEHC 765

Who, what, where, when and why

Who
  • Anne Nolan (Plaintiff)
  • Electricity Supply Board (Defendant)
  • Richard Humphreys (Judge)
What

The High Court found ageing electrical wiring was the more likely cause of a 2013 house fire, while the plaintiffs’ failure to consult the ESB and work that increased the risk of serious consequences amounted to contributory negligence.

Where

Places mentioned in the report

  • Raheny
When

Judgment:

Other dates in the report
  • 2 September 2013

    In a judgment delivered on 2 December 2015, Mr Justice Richard Humphreys held that the more probable cause of the fire was deterioration of the electrical wiring through inherent ageing, rather than overheating caused by the wiring being enclosed between soffit boards. The fire broke out at about 2pm on 2 September 2013 at the front corner of the semi-detached house.

Why

Reasons reported in the judgment

The High Court found the Electricity Supply Board liable for damage caused by a fire at Sylvester and Anne Nolan’s home in Raheny, but reduced their damages by 50% for contributory negligence.

The High Court found the Electricity Supply Board liable for damage caused by a fire at Sylvester and Anne Nolan’s home in Raheny, but reduced their damages by 50% for contributory negligence.

In a judgment delivered on 2 December 2015, Mr Justice Richard Humphreys held that the more probable cause of the fire was deterioration of the electrical wiring through inherent ageing, rather than overheating caused by the wiring being enclosed between soffit boards. The fire broke out at about 2pm on 2 September 2013 at the front corner of the semi-detached house.

The Nolans had sued the ESB for damages in contract and negligence. The court heard evidence from both plaintiffs and experts for each side. The judge said a connection failure at one of two junctions was where the fire began. He found that the condition of connectors at a neighbouring house, believed to have been installed around the same time, and signs of ageing in wiring inside the Nolans’ home supported the ageing explanation.

The court did not find that the contractor who carried out exterior work in 2005 had moved the cables enough to damage them. A possible disturbance during works by UPC was raised but not explored or pressed. The judge also rejected ordinary household electricity use as a cause.

Although the judge found the ESB legally liable for the loss, he accepted two grounds of contributory negligence. The contractor had unclipped ESB cables without notifying the board, and the new PVC soffit board was placed beneath the original timber board, increasing the risk of serious consequences if a connector failed. The court did not determine the precise work carried out on the cables beyond their being unclipped.

The parties had agreed special damages of €148,831.63. The judge assessed general damages for inconvenience and distress at €40,000, making €188,831.63 before the reduction. Applying a 50% reduction to the combined damages, he entered a decree for the plaintiffs for €94,415.82.

Read the original court judgment

Something looks wrong?

Highlight the relevant passage or flag this article for review. Review requests do not immediately change the report.

Email a correction request

Request a review