Courts / Dublin / Report

DPP's "quasi-immunity" from giving reasons for prosecutorial decisions no longer "justifiable", court told

Date
2016-06-22
Stage
Appeal
Primary locality
Mountjoy
County
Dublin

Summary

In a 2016 Court of Appeal hearing, lawyers for Eric Eoin Marques, a 30‑year‑old Irishman accused by the FBI of running a child‑pornography site, argued that the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) no longer had a "quasi‑immunity" to refuse to give reasons for its decision not to prosecute him in Ireland. Marques, who has been in custody since 2013 and whose extradition to the United States was ordered by the High Court, appealed a judicial review of the DPP's refusal. Counsel Micheál P O'Higgins cited the Supreme Court's *Murphy* decision, which required the DPP to provide reasons for prosecutorial decisions, and argued that the refusal was unjustifiable. The DPP's counsel, Patrick McGrath, countered that no constitutional right was infringed and that the refusal was based on public‑interest considerations. The case was set to resume the following day.

Who, what, where, when and why

What: Report matter: DPP's "quasi-immunity" from giving reasons for prosecutorial decisions no longer "justifiable", court told. Procedural stage: appeal

When:

Why: Mr O'Higgins said the DPP's "blanket" refusal to give reasons for its decision was like telling a child they can't go to the cinema 'because I say so'. CNI source report

Places mentioned

Residence
Secondary Mention
Court Venue
  • High Court
  • Court of Appeal
  • Special Criminal Court
  • Supreme Court
  • The High Court

Topics

Stage Appeal

Related court reports

Read the original CNI report

Correction or retraction request

If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.

Email a correction request