Courts / Waterford / Report
Complainant tells trial he was further abused while under foster care
Summary
During a trial at the Central Criminal Court, a 12‑year‑old boy, who was removed from his family home after alleging that his father raped him and forced him to have sex with his mother, testified that he was sexually abused while in foster care. He said the first foster family was almost as bad as his parents, with constant shouting but no hitting or rape. He also claimed that a relative of his foster mother sexually abused him, describing an older boy who wanted to have sex with him. The boy denied that his father had a gun to his head or that the father owned 50 guns and 50 bullets, insisting the allegations were true. The trial continues with the boy's evidence before Mr Justice Robert Eagar and a jury. The unnamed 12-year-old pleaded not guilty.
Who, what, where, when and why
What: Report matter: Complainant tells trial he was further abused while under foster care. Charges or matters: 16 counts each of sexual exploitation and one charge each of child cruelty. Procedural stage: trial
When:
- 2007 and 2011 Incident
- 2016-04-18 Publication
Why: " The child agreed with his father's defence counsel, Colman Cody SC, that he tried to run away from his first foster home because he missed his parents. Defence account reported by CNI
Case subjects
Defendant
Charges: 16 counts each of sexual exploitation and one charge each of child cruelty (Alleged Or Contested)
Plea: Not guilty
Places mentioned
- Central Criminal Court
Topics
Related court reports
- Mentally ill man who put fellow psychiatric patient in chokehold to be immediately released into care of UK parents
- Former Christian Brothers accused of breach of duty to be named in national newspaper
- Murderer claims reference to Conor McGregor brought 'toxic masculinity' baggage
- Combined 15-year sentence for violent rape and abuse is upheld
- High Court to consider publishing names of 340 former Christian Brothers
- Disability charity boss wins record €323k for 'egregious' whistleblower penalisation
Help us improve this report
Your request is saved for the newsroom's next review. It does not immediately change the published report.
Prefer email? Send a correction request.