Courts / Wexford / Report
Abuser argues evidence he asked witness if she felt 'horny' shouldn't have been heard
Summary
Dan Brosnan is appealing convictions for indecently assaulting two sisters, arguing that evidence about a sexually charged question put to another witness was unfairly admitted. The Court of Appeal reserved judgment after hearing competing arguments about the evidence and the limits of cross-examination.
Who, what, where, when and why
What: Report matter: Abuser argues evidence he asked witness if she felt 'horny' shouldn't have been heard. Procedural stage: appeal. Findings: Convicted
When:
- 2026-03-23 Publication
Case subjects
Dan Brosnan
Applicant
Finding: Convicted
Outcome: Convicted
Places mentioned
Topics
Related court reports
- 'Betrayal beyond words': victim of childhood abuse discovered husband was raping their daughter
- Man who raped and abused stepdaughter from age 6 refused permission to resile from guilty plea
- 'Come out, you Indians. I'll show you': man accused of racist attack in Cherrywood
- 'Danger to young girls' gets 11.5 years for rape of teenager
- Court refuses to reduce sentence for brothel keeper caught with child abuse material
- Brian Grendon to face non-jury trial for directing criminal gang
Correction or retraction request
If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.
Email a correction request