Courts / Kerry / Report

'Honour killing' convict was misidentified at trial, lawyers claim

Date
2026-01-13
Stage
Appeal
Primary locality
Tralee
County
Kerry

Summary

The Court of Appeal has reserved judgment in the appeal against the murder convictions of Michael Dooley, Thomas Dooley Jnr, and Patrick Dooley. The three men, who pleaded not guilty, were found guilty by a jury in 2024 of murdering Thomas Dooley at Rath Cemetery in County Kerry on October 5, 2022. Prosecutors alleged the attack was an 'honour killing' carried out with 'focused and murderous ferocity' using bladed weapons. All three appellants received life sentences from Ms Justice Mary Ellen Ring in July 2024. During the appeal, counsel for Michael Dooley argued he was misidentified and the case should have been withdrawn from the jury. Counsel for Thomas Dooley Jnr contended his arrest was unlawful, while Patrick Dooley's lawyers challenged the admission of evidence regarding a weapon. The DPP countered that circumstantial evidence, including CCTV of vehicles fleeing the scene and the discovery of Michael Dooley in a van, supported the convictions. The court heard that the misidentification issue was extensively addressed in the trial judge's directions. The matter was adjourned as the court reserved judgment.

Who, what, where, when and why

What: Report matter: 'Honour killing' convict was misidentified at trial, lawyers claim. Procedural stage: appeal

When:

Why: by Fiona Magennis Lawyers for a man appealing his conviction for the murder of Thomas 'Tom' Dooley in an 'honour killing' during a funeral in County Kerry have argued the case should have been withdrawn from the jury because he was "misidentified as a person who was at the violent attack". CNI source report

Case subjects

Thomas Dooley

Convicted Person

Plea: Not guilty

Outcome: On the first day of the appeal hearing yesterday, Thomas Dooley Jnr's barrister, Thomas Creed SC, argued that his arrest and detention by gardaĆ­ was unlawful, while Patrick Dooley's senior counsel Michael O'Higgins contended that a "leading question" put to a witness about a sword or machete allegedly held by Patrick should not have been permitted into evidence at the men's trial. The youth, who was a juvenile when the attack on Thomas Dooley took place, was sentenced following the Supreme Court's landmark ruling which held that life sentences for a child convicted of murder should only be imposed in exceptional cases where the evidence showed the intentions and actions of the child were akin to those of an adult.

Thomas Dooley Jnr

Convicted Person

Plea: Not guilty

Outcome: On the first day of the appeal hearing yesterday, Thomas Dooley Jnr's barrister, Thomas Creed SC, argued that his arrest and detention by gardaĆ­ was unlawful, while Patrick Dooley's senior counsel Michael O'Higgins contended that a "leading question" put to a witness about a sword or machete allegedly held by Patrick should not have been permitted into evidence at the men's trial.

Places mentioned

Address Area
  • Carrigrohane Road
Secondary Mention
Residence
Court Venue
  • Central Criminal Court
  • Court of Appeal
  • Supreme Court
Facility

Topics

Stage Appeal Violent Crime

Related court reports

Read the original CNI report

Correction or retraction request

If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.

Email a correction request