Courts / Cork / Report
Row arising out of Shane Long transfer comes before High Court
Summary
A dispute over Shane Long's transfer from Reading FC to West Bromwich Albion has been brought before the High Court by Mr Alan O'Mahony. O'Mahony claims he acquired a 10% interest in Long's earlier 2005 transfer from Cork City FC to Reading FC, which should entitle him to a share of the £5.1 million fee paid by West Bromwich Albion in 2011. He alleges that the liquidator of Cork City Investments, Mr Carl Dillon, sold the benefit of Long's contract to Reading FC in 2010, thereby depriving him of the contractual benefit. O'Mahony seeks damages for alleged negligence, breach of duty and breach of contract, and requests declarations that he is entitled to the benefit and that the sale to Reading is void. The case is ongoing; a pre‑trial motion was adjourned to allow document exchange. The action does not involve Shane Long, who is currently playing for Southampton FC.
Who, what, where, when and why
What: Report matter: Row arising out of Shane Long transfer comes before High Court. Procedural stage: hearing_or_decision
When:
- October 2010 Other
- February 2010 Other
- May 2010 Other
- August 2011 Other
- 2015-11-19 Publication
Why: Mr O'Mahony claims he did not receive the benefit of his interest in the contract because Mr Carl Dillon, the liquidator of Cork City Investments FC Ltd, the then holding company of Cork City, allegedly sold the benefit of Shane Long's contract to Reading FC prior to the player's move to WBA. CNI source report
Case subjects
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Places mentioned
Topics
Related court reports
- ESB worker too late to pursue claim seeking €42k in alleged unpaid overtime
- Seamstress treated 'shabbily' after 17 years at Cork shop wins €76k
- Pub ordered to pay €10k for 'humiliating' remark about barman by company boss
- Former accountant went on 'nationwide tour' with bank card stolen from hospital patient
- Car salesman sacked over 'around the corner deal' wins €10k
- Salesman who alleged 'corruption' and 'crazy' discount in Saudi deal loses penalisation case
If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.
Email a correction request