Courts / Cork / Report
Jurisdiction issue in challenge brought by company involving rugby star O'Gara
Summary
The High Court has adjourned a preliminary jurisdictional hearing in an application by Ezeon Entertainment Limited to set aside a Personal Insolvency Arrangement (PIA) granted to shareholder John O'Driscoll. The company, whose shareholders include rugby player Ronan O'Gara and businessman Michael O'Flynn, alleges the PIA was fraudulent and that O'Driscoll misappropriated over €15,000 in company funds. O'Driscoll denies all claims, stating he withdrew the money to repay debts he was owed and that the allegations are incorrect. Counsel for the respondent's Personal Insolvency Practitioner argued the High Court lacks jurisdiction, contending the matter should have been heard by the Circuit Court which originally granted the PIA in March 2022. Conversely, Ezeon's counsel argued the High Court does have jurisdiction. Mr Justice Alexander Owens stated the preliminary issue of jurisdiction must be decided first. He adjourned the matter for one week to allow the parties to exchange documents on this issue. The judge indicated he intends to fix a date for the hearing of the preliminary jurisdictional issue when the application returns before him next Monday. The court noted that O'Flynn previously lacked standing to overturn the PIA and that his appeal to the Supreme Court remains undetermined. O'Gara, who stated he was unaware of the PIA until media reports, expressed that he felt a material breach of trust had occurred, though he denied wishing to pursue a personal dispute.
Who, what, where, when and why
What: Report matter: Jurisdiction issue in challenge brought by company involving rugby star O'Gara. Charges or matters: alleged fraudulent PIA; alleged misappropriation of company funds. Procedural stage: hearing_or_decision
When:
- March 2022 Hearing Or Sentence
- 2023-01-16 Publication
Why: Ezeon claims that because it was never given any notice of Mr O'Driscoll's initial application for protection from his creditors, the company was never received a proper opportunity to object to him being granted a PIA. CNI source report
Case subjects
Respondent
Charges: alleged fraudulent PIA; alleged misappropriation of company funds (Alleged Or Contested)
Applicant
Applicant
Places mentioned
- The High Court
- High Court
- Supreme Court
Topics
Related court reports
- Mentally ill man who put fellow psychiatric patient in chokehold to be immediately released into care of UK parents
- 'Alternative dispute resolution': man arranged 'straightener' during which dad-of-seven was stabbed to death
- Brothers who sexually assaulted teenage girls in mid-nineties can now be identified for first time
- ESB worker too late to pursue claim seeking €42k in alleged unpaid overtime
- 'No hand, act or part': Osgur Breatnach's wrongful conviction for Sallins train robbery declared a miscarriage of justice
- Migrant engineer who worked 10-hour days for under minimum wage wins €14k
If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.
Email a correction request