Courts / Wicklow / Report

Dwyer's lawyers tell appeal that phone data retention is 'opportunistic form of mass surveillance'

Date
2022-12-01
Stage
Appeal
Primary locality
Wicklow
County
Wicklow

Summary

In a Court of Appeal hearing on 1 December 2022, lawyers for Graham Dwyer argued that the retention of mobile‑phone data used in his 2015 murder trial was an "opportunistic form of mass surveillance" that breached his rights under the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. Remy Farrell SC contended that the 2011 Communications (Retention of Data) Act, which required mobile‑phone companies to keep data for two years, amounted to indiscriminate surveillance of all phone users, not just suspected criminals, and that the data from Dwyer's work phone had been used to build a detailed picture of his life. Michael Bowman SC added that the trial judge's non‑verbal behaviour and the introduction of nine videos of Dwyer with various women may have unduly influenced the jury. Dwyer, 50, was convicted of murdering 36‑year‑old Elaine O'Hara in 2012 and was sentenced in 2015.

Who, what, where, when and why

What: Report matter: Dwyer's lawyers tell appeal that phone data retention is 'opportunistic form of mass surveillance'. Procedural stage: appeal. Findings: Convicted

When:

Why: But, he said, "one has to accept the result and then fully internalise the result because all State institutions, particularly the courts, are under a duty of loyal cooperation insofar as the Court of Justice is concerned. CNI source report

Case subjects

Elaine O'Hara

Applicant

Finding: Convicted

Outcome: Convicted

Graham Dwyer

Appellant

Finding: Convicted

Outcome: Convicted

Places mentioned

Court Venue
  • Court of Appeal
  • Central Criminal Court
Secondary Mention

Topics

Stage Appeal Violent Crime

Related court reports

Read the original CNI report

Correction or retraction request

If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.

Email a correction request