Courts / Dublin / Report
State rejects claims that hotel quarantine during pandemic was unconstitutional
Summary
The State has rejected claims that mandatory hotel quarantine measures during the pandemic were unconstitutional, in a High Court case brought by Niamh Mulreany and Kirstie McGrath. The two applicants, who are lone parents, were arrested at Dublin Airport on April 2, 2021, after refusing to undergo mandatory quarantine at a hotel following their return from Dubai. They alleged they could not afford the €1,800 cost per person and that their childcare arrangements were only valid for the duration of their holiday. Acting for the State, Michael Cush SC argued that the Minister for Health was lawfully entitled to designate the UAE as a country requiring mandatory quarantine under the 1947 Health Act, noting the measure included a sunset clause requiring Oireachtas approval for extension. The State also dismissed arguments that the appeal process for quarantined individuals breached the constitution. The applicants, seeking to halt their prosecutions, alleged that the Ministerial order breached the separation of powers and should have been introduced via legislation. They also claimed the offence of resisting transfer to a designated facility was invalid and sought damages. Arising from their refusals, both applicants were charged with breaches of the 1947 Health Act, facing potential fines of up to €2,000 and imprisonment if convicted. The hearing before Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger continues, with the judge indicating an intention to reserve her decision following the conclusion of submissions.
Who, what, where, when and why
What: Report matter: State rejects claims that hotel quarantine during pandemic was unconstitutional. Procedural stage: sentence
When:
- April 2, 2021 Incident
- March 2021 Other
- 2022-11-09 Publication
Why: The women refused to undergo mandatory quarantine at a hotel because they claimed they could not afford the cost of the stay at €1,800 each and because childcare arrangements they had put in place were only for the duration of their holiday. CNI source report
Case subjects
Applicant
Outcome: Arising out of their refusals to go the hotel, both applicants were charged with breaches of the 1947 Health Act and if convicted face fines of up to €2,000 and a period of several months' imprisonment.
Applicant
Applicant
Places mentioned
Topics
Related court reports
- Man charged with having 56k child abuse images and videos remanded on bail
- Ex-Dáil hopeful's allegations against former employer 'complete fantasy', WRC told
- Mater must pay €10k to worker who said he was wrongly accused of abusing patient
- 'I think we know I won't be getting bail' - Daniel Kinahan charged with directing criminal organisation
- Letting agent who claimed alleged domestic violence victim abandoned tenancy by fleeing to refuge must pay €14.7k
- 77-year-old with 470 convictions told Luas staff to 'f**k off'
If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.
Email a correction request