Courts / Dublin / Report

Ageism complaint against TikTok had 'no basis in fact', WRC finds

Date
2022-10-27
Stage
Hearing Or Decision
Primary locality
Dublin
County
Dublin

Summary

Mr Hatem Mohamed, a job applicant, claimed he was denied a position at TikTok because of his age, alleging a question about working with a team leader in his twenties was asked during his third interview. The Workplace Relations Commission rejected his complaint under the Employment Equality Act 1998, stating the claim had no basis in fact. TikTok's legal team argued there was no discrimination, and interview notes showed no reference to such a question. The interviewer, Sohail Khan, confirmed he never asked about age or a younger team leader and that the question was not relevant to the role. The WRC found TikTok's recruitment process was robust and diverse, and Mr Mohamed failed to prove any discriminatory conduct. The complaint was not upheld.

Who, what, where, when and why

What: Report matter: Ageism complaint against TikTok had 'no basis in fact', WRC finds. Procedural stage: hearing_or_decision

When:

Why: A job applicant who claimed he was not offered a job at TikTok because he is aged in his forties has lost his discrimination claim over allegedly being asked how he would handle "working with a team leader in his twenties". CNI source report

Case subjects

Hatem Mohamed

Applicant

Places mentioned

Secondary Mention

Topics

Stage Hearing Or Decision

Related court reports

Read the original CNI report

Correction or retraction request

If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.

Email a correction request