Courts / Dublin / Report

Nothing to contradict suggestion that same person used Graham Dwyer's work phone and "Master" phone found in reservoir, trial hears

Date
2015-03-05
Stage
Charge Or Pretrial
Primary locality
Rathfarnham
County
Dublin

Summary

During the 31st day of Graham Dwyer's murder trial, analyst Sarah Skedd testified that there was no evidence contradicting the suggestion that the same person used both Dwyer's work phone and the 'Master' phone found in Vartry Reservoir. Skedd compared usage patterns of the two Nokia mobiles, noting that each phone only had the other's number saved. She observed that when both phones were active simultaneously, they used cell sites in the same area, though on different networks. For example, on 21 December 2011, both phones used a Fitzwilliam Street cell site, and later that day they both used sites near Howth Harbour and Dwyer's workplace. The court had already heard that Dwyer was charged with murdering 36‑year‑old childcare worker Elaine O'Hara on 22 August 2012, and that the prosecution alleged he stabbed her for sexual gratification.

Who, what, where, when and why

What: Report matter: Nothing to contradict suggestion that same person used Graham Dwyer's work phone and "Master" phone found in reservoir, trial hears. Charges or matters: murdering Dubliner Elaine O'Hara at Killakee, Rathfarnham, Dublin on 22nd August 2012; murdering the 36-year-old childcare worker on that date. Procedural stage: charge_or_pretrial

When:

Why: Ms Skedd explained that, given both phones used different networks, she wouldn't have expected them to use exactly the same cell sites. CNI source report

Case subjects

Graham Dwyer

Accused

Charges: murdering Dubliner Elaine O'Hara at Killakee, Rathfarnham, Dublin on 22nd August 2012; murdering the 36-year-old childcare worker on that date (Alleged Or Contested)

Places mentioned

Court Venue
  • Central Criminal Court
Secondary Mention
Address Area
  • Fitzwilliam Street

Topics

Stage Charge Or Pretrial Violent Crime

Related court reports

Read the original CNI report

Correction or retraction request

If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.

Email a correction request