Courts / Meath / Report
Supreme Court won't hear Ben Gilroy's bid to halt possession of home
Summary
The Supreme Court declined to hear Ben Gilroy and his wife Sarah Jane Gilroy's appeal against a possession order granted to Start Mortgages DAC for their Navan home. The Court found no point of general public importance had been raised. The Gilroys had argued that a fraud had occurred involving the lender and a solicitor, and that changes had been made to the mortgage documentation. The Circuit Court rejected these claims, finding them farfetched and unsupported, and the High Court confirmed the absence of evidence for fraud. The Gilroys sought a priority hearing and referral to EU courts, but the Supreme Court held that their due‑process rights had been fully addressed in lower courts and that it could not revisit the earlier findings. The application was dismissed by a panel of three judges, including Mr Justice Peter Charleton, Mr Justice Seamus Woulfe and Mr Justice Brian Murray.
Who, what, where, when and why
What: Report matter: Supreme Court won't hear Ben Gilroy's bid to halt possession of home. Procedural stage: hearing_or_decision
When:
- 2022-07-08 Publication
Places mentioned
- The Supreme Court
- Supreme Court
- Gilroys. The Circuit Court
- The Circuit Court
- High Court
Topics
Fraud Stage Hearing Or Decision
Related court reports
- 'He told me he loved me, but I just kept stabbing him' - lawyer on trial accused of murdering father
- Drug-driving case dismissed on appeal
- 'Far from peripheral' - Regency getaway drivers fail to have sentences reduced
- Regency getaway drivers say prison sentences were too high
- Former accountant went on 'nationwide tour' with bank card stolen from hospital patient
- Ten-year prison sentence over life-altering assault outside Dublin casino
If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.
Email a correction request