Courts / Dublin / Report
George Bento murder trial: what the jury didn't hear
Summary
After George Bento was arraigned, his defence counsel Padraig Dwyer SC applied to the court, arguing that the murder charge was unsupported by evidence and that the case should be charged as manslaughter. He cited CCTV footage showing other individuals attacking Bento and his companion, and claimed that Bento's use of force was reasonable and in self‑defence, defence of another and property. Dwyer also requested the judge to monitor the evidence for fairness, stating that an unfair trial could result if the jury considered a murder charge. The prosecution, led by Sean Guerin SC, countered that the CCTV and eyewitness accounts established a murder charge, noting that a 16‑year‑old received two fatal stab wounds. Mr Justice Paul Burns ruled that the court would not remove the murder count, allowing it to proceed to the jury. During the trial, a large group of Deliveroo riders attended the courtroom in uniform, expressing solidarity with Bento.
Who, what, where, when and why
What: Report matter: George Bento murder trial: what the jury didn't hear. Procedural stage: trial
When:
- January 28, 2021 Incident
- 2022-06-14 Publication
Case subjects
Accused
Places mentioned
Topics
Related court reports
- Man charged with having 56k child abuse images and videos remanded on bail
- Ex-Dáil hopeful's allegations against former employer 'complete fantasy', WRC told
- Mater must pay €10k to worker who said he was wrongly accused of abusing patient
- 'I think we know I won't be getting bail' - Daniel Kinahan charged with directing criminal organisation
- Letting agent who claimed alleged domestic violence victim abandoned tenancy by fleeing to refuge must pay €14.7k
- 77-year-old with 470 convictions told Luas staff to 'f**k off'
If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.
Email a correction request