Courts / Ireland / Report

Credibility issues in children's evidence, defence tell Munster Abuse trial jury

Summary

In the Munster Abuse trial, the jury was instructed to scrutinise the credibility of children's testimony. Defence counsel Anthony Sammon SC argued that the case against the children's aunt was not "rock solid," citing diary entries from the foster mother that questioned the children's reliability. He highlighted the children's varied personalities, alleged fabrication of stories, and instances where the foster mother's instructions may have influenced the children's statements. Sammon urged the jury to remain sceptical, noting that the children had withdrawn allegations against other family members but not against the aunt. The prosecution, represented by Bernard Condon SC, maintained that the aunt was not central but still responsible, while Andrew Sexton SC defended the aunt's husband, stressing his denial of abuse and the implausibility of the allegations. The trial continued with the jury hearing further evidence and arguments from both sides. The unnamed 35-year-old pleaded not guilty.

Who, what, where, when and why

What: Report matter: Credibility issues in children's evidence, defence tell Munster Abuse trial jury. Charges or matters: three counts, including sexually assaulting the girl and sexually assaulting one of the boys at locations in Munster on unknown dates between August 18, 2014 and April 28, 2016. Procedural stage: trial

When:

• August 18, 2014 Incident
• April 28, 2016 Incident
• 2014 and 2016 Other
• 2021-07-22 Publication

Why: He said he was telling the garda this because his foster mother told him to write this incident down. CNI source report

Case subjects

Places mentioned

Topics

Stage Trial

Read the original CNI report