Courts / Dublin / Report

Jury in HIV case should have got evidence warning, appeal court told

Date
2021-07-20
Stage
Appeal
Primary locality
Dublin
County
Dublin

Summary

In a 2021 Court of Appeal hearing, the lawyer for a Ugandan man serving a ten‑year sentence for infecting two women with HIV argued that the trial judge should have warned the jury that the case relied on circumstantial evidence. The appellant, 30, had been convicted in 2018 for intentionally or recklessly causing serious harm to the women between November 2009 and June 2010. The appeal centred on whether the jury was properly directed about the nature of the evidence, as no conclusive scientific proof of transmission was presented. The Court of Appeal noted that the defence had not raised the issue at the lower court, but the judge could still consider it. The court reserved judgment, with the appeal focusing on the adequacy of the jury's instructions regarding circumstantial evidence. The case remains at the appeal stage, with no outcome announced.

Who, what, where, when and why

What: Report matter: Jury in HIV case should have got evidence warning, appeal court told. Procedural stage: appeal

When:

Why: Mr Greene said it was the prosecution's case at trial that it was not circumstantial but that this could not be true because there was no testimony to "primary fact". Prosecution account reported by CNI

Places mentioned

Court Venue
  • Court of Appeal
  • Dublin
  • Dublin Circuit Criminal Court

Topics

Stage Appeal

Related court reports

Read the original CNI report

Correction or retraction request

If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.

Email a correction request