Courts / Ireland / Report

Bankruptcy should not be extended because of official's conduct, Dunne's barrister argues

Summary

In the High Court, Sean Dunne's barrister Barra McGrory argued that the bankruptcy of the businessman should not be extended because the conduct of the Official Assignee, Chris Lehane, was far below expectations. McGrory contended that Dunne had not ignored his Irish bankruptcy, as alleged, and had opposed it in Irish courts while also facing a dual bankruptcy in the United States. Mark Sanfey SC for Lehane rejected all of Dunne's claims, stating that the businessman had not cooperated until early 2016 and that his cooperation was insufficient to secure discharge. The judge, Ms Justice Caroline Costello, reserved her decision, noting the time‑sensitive nature of the matter. Dunne's Irish bankruptcy, originally due to expire in July 2016, has been extended pending the outcome of this hearing, with a maximum possible extension of five years.

Who, what, where, when and why

What: Report matter: Bankruptcy should not be extended because of official's conduct, Dunne's barrister argues. Procedural stage: hearing_or_decision

When:

• July 2016 Hearing Or Sentence
• February 2013 Hearing Or Sentence
• July 2013 Hearing Or Sentence
• 2018-04-27 Publication

Why: Credit: Collins) Businessman Sean Dunne's bankruptcy should not be extended because of the conduct of the official in charge of the process, the High Court has heard. CNI source report

Places mentioned

Topics

Stage Hearing Or Decision

Read the original CNI report