Courts / Louth / Report

Dispute over documents in Sean Gallagher "Tweetgate" action

Date
2014-05-02
Stage
Hearing Or Decision
Primary locality
Louth
County
Louth

Summary

In a High Court dispute, former presidential candidate Sean Gallagher seeks a declaration that RTE's 2011 Frontline debate was unfairly edited to damage his electoral prospects and that the broadcast was neither objective nor impartial. He also seeks damages for alleged breach of statutory duty, negligence, misfeasance, and exemplary damages for comments by Pat Kenny. RTE denies the claims, arguing Gallagher's election prospects were harmed by his own actions, including arranging a meeting with a former Taoiseach for €5,000 and collecting a cheque. Gallagher's lawyers argue that RTE should provide documents from the debate and the period up to the internal review published in November 2012, including Twitter material, RTE protocols, and notes on audience selection. RTE contends it will only disclose materials generated on the debate day or the following week, claiming a broader request is unfair and costly.

Who, what, where, when and why

What: Report matter: Dispute over documents in Sean Gallagher "Tweetgate" action. Procedural stage: hearing_or_decision

When:

Why: In his action against RTE Mr Gallagher seeks a declaration from the High Court the RTE Frontline debate in October 2011 was deliberately and unfairly edited, presented and directed by RTE in order to damage his electoral prospects in the election. CNI source report

Case subjects

Sean Gallagher

Defendant

Places mentioned

Court Venue
  • High Court
Secondary Mention

Topics

Stage Hearing Or Decision

Related court reports

Read the original CNI report

Correction or retraction request

If a fact, identity, locality or legal outcome needs review, email the newsroom with this report's details prefilled.

Email a correction request